Physics – Condensed Matter – Superconductivity
Scientific paper
1999-12-13
Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5900 (2000).
Physics
Condensed Matter
Superconductivity
3 figures, submitted to PRL
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5900
The influence of magnetic (S=1) and nonmagnetic (S=0) impurities on the spin dynamics of an optimally doped high temperature superconductor is compared in two samples with almost identical superconducting transition temperatures: YBa$_2$(Cu$_{0.97}$Ni$_{0.03}$)$_3$O$_7$ (T$_c$=80 K) and YBa$_2$(Cu$_{0.99}$Zn$_{0.01}$)$_3$O$_7$ (T$_c$=78 K). In the Ni-substituted system, the magnetic resonance peak (which is observed at E$_r \simeq$40 meV in the pure system) shifts to lower energy with a preserved E$_r$/T$_c$ ratio while the shift is much smaller upon Zn substitution. By contrast Zn, but not Ni, restores significant spin fluctuations around 40 meV in the normal state. These observations are discussed in the light of models proposed for the magnetic resonance peak.
Aksay I. A.
Bossy J.
Bourges Ph.
Collin Gaston
Fong H. F.
No associations
LandOfFree
Quantum Impurities and the Neutron Resonance Peak in ${\bf YBa_2 Cu_3 O_7}$: Ni versus Zn does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Quantum Impurities and the Neutron Resonance Peak in ${\bf YBa_2 Cu_3 O_7}$: Ni versus Zn, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quantum Impurities and the Neutron Resonance Peak in ${\bf YBa_2 Cu_3 O_7}$: Ni versus Zn will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-529859