Comments on "Venus' spectroscopic phase variation: Implications of the Mariner 10 photographs

Details Comments on "Venus' spectroscopic phase variation: Implications of the Mariner 10 photographs Comments on "Venus' spectroscopic phase variation: Implications of the Mariner 10 photographs

Apr 1975

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1975stin...7520186y&link_type=abstract

Unknown

Physics

Mariner Space Probes, Phase Shift, Spectroscopic Analysis, Venus Atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide, Near Infrared Radiation, Near Ultraviolet Radiation, Uniqueness Theorem

Scientific paper

From a misinterpretation of Mariner 10 pictures, Chamberlain (1974) constructed a model in which he used horizontal variations in the Venus atmosphere to explain the phase-variation of CO2 absorption at small phase angles. Published observations of spatial variations in CO2 absorption on Venus show that they are too small to explain the phase effect. The question of uniqueness that is, if more than one model can explain the phase-effect observations is discussed. Before this question can be answered, a realistic model that does account for the data must be constructed. No such calculations exist.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comments on "Venus' spectroscopic phase variation: Implications of the Mariner 10 photographs does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comments on "Venus' spectroscopic phase variation: Implications of the Mariner 10 photographs, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comments on "Venus' spectroscopic phase variation: Implications of the Mariner 10 photographs will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-949225