Physics – Condensed Matter – Materials Science
Scientific paper
2002-04-04
Physica Scripta T68, C133 (2003)
Physics
Condensed Matter
Materials Science
16 pages, Revtex, no figures
Scientific paper
10.1238/Physica.Regular.068aC013
We compare two different approaches to investigations of many-electron systems. The first is the Hartree-Fock (HF) method and the second is the Density Functional Theory (DFT). Overview of the main features and peculiar properties of the HF method are presented. A way to realize the HF method within the Kohn-Sham (KS) approach of the DFT is discussed. We show that this is impossible without including a specific correlation energy, which is defined by the difference between the sum of the kinetic and exchange energies of a system considered within KS and HF, respectively. It is the nonlocal exchange potential entering the HF equations that generates this correlation energy. We show that the total correlation energy of a finite electron system, which has to include this correlation energy, cannot be obtained from considerations of uniform electron systems. The single-particle excitation spectrum of many-electron systems is related to the eigenvalues of the corresponding KS equations. We demonstrate that this spectrum does not coincide in general with the eigenvalues of KS or HF equations.
Amusia Ya. M.
Msezane Alfred Z.
Shaginyan Vasily R.
No associations
LandOfFree
Density Functional Theory versus the Hartree Fock Method: Comparative Assessment does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Density Functional Theory versus the Hartree Fock Method: Comparative Assessment, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Density Functional Theory versus the Hartree Fock Method: Comparative Assessment will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-640192