Physics – Classical Physics
Scientific paper
2003-08-08
Found.Phys.Lett. 17 (2004) 479-496
Physics
Classical Physics
17 pages, 6 figures, LaTeX, important changes in the presentation, there is no change, however, in the main message of the pap
Scientific paper
10.1023/B:FOPL.0000042699.91773.
In classical mechanics, Galilean covariance and the principle of relativity are completely equivalent and hold for all possible dynamical processes. In contrast, in relativistic physics the situation is much more complex. It will be shown that Lorentz covariance and the principle of relativity are not completely equivalent. The reason is that the principle of relativity actually only holds for the equilibrium quantities that characterize the equilibrium state of dissipative systems. In the light of this fact it will be argued that Lorentz covariance should not be regarded as a fundamental symmetry of the laws of physics.
No associations
LandOfFree
On the meaning of Lorentz covariance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the meaning of Lorentz covariance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the meaning of Lorentz covariance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-616781