Comment on "Violation of Anderson's Theorem for the sign-reversing s-wave state of Iron-Pnictide Superconductors" by Onari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 177001(2009)[1]

Details Comment on "Violation of Anderson's Theorem for the sign-reversing s-wave state of Iron-Pnictide Superconductors" by Onari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 177001(2009)[1] Comment on "Violation of Anderson's Theorem for the sign-reversing s-wave state of Iron-Pnictide Superconductors" by Onari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 177001(2009)[1]

2010-12-02

arxiv.org/abs/1012.0414v1

Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 259701 (2011)

Physics

Condensed Matter

Superconductivity

1 page, 1 figure

Scientific paper

We pointed out that the main claim of Ref.[1] that the presence of the
orbital degree of freedom is essential to describe the correct impurity effects
for Iron-based superconductors is incorrect and demonstrated the equivalent
results of Tc suppression due to impurities by both the band basis model and
the orbital basis model.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comment on "Violation of Anderson's Theorem for the sign-reversing s-wave state of Iron-Pnictide Superconductors" by Onari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 177001(2009)[1] does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Violation of Anderson's Theorem for the sign-reversing s-wave state of Iron-Pnictide Superconductors" by Onari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 177001(2009)[1], we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Violation of Anderson's Theorem for the sign-reversing s-wave state of Iron-Pnictide Superconductors" by Onari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 177001(2009)[1] will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-603645