Which nanowire couples better electrically to a metal contact: armchair or zigzag nanotube?

Physics – Condensed Matter – Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

To be published in Applied Physics Letters, April 02, 2001 issue. Fig. 2 now includes a plot of T_RL in the presence of a meta

Scientific paper

10.1063/1.1360228

The fundamental question of how chirality affects the electronic coupling of a nanotube to metal contacts is important for the application of nanotubes as nanowires. We show that metallic-zigzag nanotubes are superior to armchair nanotubes as nanowires, by modeling the metal-nanotube interface. More specifically, we show that as a function of coupling strength, the total electron transmission of armchair nanotubes increases and tends to be pinned close to unity for a metal with Fermi wave vector close to that of gold. In contrast, the total transmission of zigzag nanotubes increases to the maximum possible value of two. The origin of these effects lies in the details of the wave function, which is explained.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Which nanowire couples better electrically to a metal contact: armchair or zigzag nanotube? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Which nanowire couples better electrically to a metal contact: armchair or zigzag nanotube?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Which nanowire couples better electrically to a metal contact: armchair or zigzag nanotube? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-520008

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.