Physics – Condensed Matter
Scientific paper
1992-12-29
Physics
Condensed Matter
28 pages, Ups.Univ
Scientific paper
We reanalyse the mathematical formulation of the flux-state problem within the $t$-$J$ model. The analysis of different parametrizations in the functional representation shows that (i) calculations which take into account constraints for the number of on-site-available states are describing quasiparticles in terms of wrong local statistics, and contain gauge non-invariant objects; (ii) application of the projection technique in the slave-boson(fermion) representation reproduces the correct statistics, and is exactly equivalent to the conventional diagram technique for Hubbard operators; (iii) it is necessary to introduce an additional equation for the effective hopping amplitude for the flux phase. With the technique for Hubbard operators, which allows one to separate charge and spin channels we construct the mean-field equations for a flux-like state which coexists with N\'eel antiferromagnetism (AF). The formal analysis shows that the equations for real and imaginary parts of the effective hopping amplitude are inconsistent for any $\theta \neq 0$ (including $\theta =\pi /4$ which gives flux 1/2). The hopping amplitude is slightly supressed by exchange renormalization. The N\'eel magnetization $m$ decreases with increasing concentration of holes. The region where antiferromagnetism exists is decreasing
Richter Manuel
Sandalov I. S.
No associations
LandOfFree
On flux phase and Néel antiferromagnetism in the {\em t}-{\em J}-model}} does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On flux phase and Néel antiferromagnetism in the {\em t}-{\em J}-model}}, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On flux phase and Néel antiferromagnetism in the {\em t}-{\em J}-model}} will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-454485