Comment on "Evidence for Coexistence of the Gap and the Pseudogap in Bi-2212 from Intrinsic Tunneling Spectroscopy"

Details Comment on "Evidence for Coexistence of the Gap and the Pseudogap in Bi-2212 from Intrinsic Tunneling Spectroscopy" Comment on "Evidence for Coexistence of the Gap and the Pseudogap in Bi-2212 from Intrinsic Tunneling Spectroscopy"

2001-02-14

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0102252v1

Physics

Condensed Matter

Strongly Correlated Electrons

2 pages, Revtex

Scientific paper

It is argued that the superconducting and pseudogaps represent different coexisting phenomena, and this observation speaks against the precursor-superconductivity scenario of the pseudogap; see, V.M. Krasnov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5860 (2000). We present brief comments showing that the experimental facts of this paper do not contradict to the observations that the pseudogap in underdoped Bi-2212 smoothly evolves into a pseudogap above critical temperature $T_c$, and the large energy gap below $T_c$ is mainly of superconducting origin. We show that appearance of this pseudogap is closely related to a new energy scale observed recently.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comment on "Evidence for Coexistence of the Gap and the Pseudogap in Bi-2212 from Intrinsic Tunneling Spectroscopy" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Evidence for Coexistence of the Gap and the Pseudogap in Bi-2212 from Intrinsic Tunneling Spectroscopy", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Evidence for Coexistence of the Gap and the Pseudogap in Bi-2212 from Intrinsic Tunneling Spectroscopy" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-432691