A trick: why \hatγ< γ(=3) in [1=arXiv:cond-mat/0106096]?

Physics – Condensed Matter – Statistical Mechanics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

double space, 5 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

In this paper, first a theorem on the partial sum of a particular series is given. Then, based on it, the origin of obvious simulation deviation from theory is explained: i) why the numerically estimated \hat\gamma (degree exponent) in [1=arXiv:cond-mat/0106096] is always smaller than \gamma (=3) that is predicted by theory; ii) and why \hat\gamma rises monotonically as m (the links added at each step in Barabasi-Albert (BA) model [1]) increases. Strictly, it declares such errors are basically from the inconsistence of simulation with the theoretical model, which is caused by an additional incompatible condition used in simulation. In addition, noticing the evolving differences between the initial m_0 nodes and those after, we correct the derived BA model which unfairly omitted such differences.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A trick: why \hatγ< γ(=3) in [1=arXiv:cond-mat/0106096]? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A trick: why \hatγ< γ(=3) in [1=arXiv:cond-mat/0106096]?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A trick: why \hatγ< γ(=3) in [1=arXiv:cond-mat/0106096]? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-416411

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.