Why is the ARPES anti-nodal singularity at 40 meV shifted in superconducting state of HTSC, but the kink at 70 meV is not?

Details Why is the ARPES anti-nodal singularity at 40 meV shifted in superconducting state of HTSC, but the kink at 70 meV is not? Why is the ARPES anti-nodal singularity at 40 meV shifted in superconducting state of HTSC, but the kink at 70 meV is not?

2003-08-28

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0308597v1

Physics

Condensed Matter

Superconductivity

Scientific paper

The theoretical model for the quasiparticle self-energy in HTSC is proposed, which is based on the forward scattering peak in the electron-phonon (EPI) interaction. By assuming that EPI dominates, the model explains qualitatively and in a consistent way the recent ARPES results. The latter show a kink in the normal state quasiparticle energy at 70 meV in the nodal direction, which is (surprisingly) not shifted in the superconducting (SC) state, while the singularity at 40 meV in the anti-nodal direction is shifted by the SC gap. The model predicts a dip-hump structure in the spectral function, which is observed in ARPES.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Why is the ARPES anti-nodal singularity at 40 meV shifted in superconducting state of HTSC, but the kink at 70 meV is not? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why is the ARPES anti-nodal singularity at 40 meV shifted in superconducting state of HTSC, but the kink at 70 meV is not?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why is the ARPES anti-nodal singularity at 40 meV shifted in superconducting state of HTSC, but the kink at 70 meV is not? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-340691