Physics – Condensed Matter – Statistical Mechanics
Scientific paper
2000-09-19
Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 85}, 893 (2000)
Physics
Condensed Matter
Statistical Mechanics
2 pages, Revtex style, Reply to the Comment cond-mat/0008209
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.893
In their Comment, Park, Park and Kim claimed that the approach devised in our work Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 83}, 5214 (1999) reproduces the correct long-time behaviour of the density and correlation functions of the model under consideration because of the {\it irrelevance} of the quartic term. Park,Park and Kim also claimed that the approach devised in Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 83}, 5214 (1999) is a traditional Hartree-Fock approach. In this Reply we argue that the results obtained with our approach are in agreement (also the subdominant corrections) with previous numerical calculations and are therefore beyond traditional approximative (e.g. Hartree-Fock) schemes. Such a striking agreement cannot, in our opinion, be explained only by the {\it eventual} irrelevance of a quartic term.
Bares Pierre-Antoine
Mobilia Mauro
No associations
LandOfFree
Reply on the Comment cond-mat/0008209 about "Solution of Classical Stochastic One-Dimensional Many-Body Systems" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Reply on the Comment cond-mat/0008209 about "Solution of Classical Stochastic One-Dimensional Many-Body Systems", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply on the Comment cond-mat/0008209 about "Solution of Classical Stochastic One-Dimensional Many-Body Systems" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-148106