Physics – Condensed Matter
Scientific paper
1996-09-26
Phys.Rev.B 55, 4695 (1997); 66, 209901(E) (2002)
Physics
Condensed Matter
9 pages, RevTeX, 6 figures. Mistake in Eq. (35) corrected
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevB.55.4695
We compare two widely used models for dephasing in a chaotic quantum dot: The introduction of a fictitious voltage probe into the scattering matrix and the addition of an imaginary potential to the Hamiltonian. We identify the limit in which the two models are equivalent and compute the distribution of the conductance in that limit. Our analysis explains why previous treatments of dephasing gave different results. The distribution remains non-Gaussian for strong dephasing if the coupling of the quantum dot to the electron reservoirs is via ballistic single-mode point contacts, but becomes Gaussian if the coupling is via tunneling contacts.
Beenakker C. W. J.
Brouwer Piet. W.
No associations
LandOfFree
Voltage-probe and imaginary potential models for dephasing in a chaotic quantum dot does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Voltage-probe and imaginary potential models for dephasing in a chaotic quantum dot, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Voltage-probe and imaginary potential models for dephasing in a chaotic quantum dot will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-112486