Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky

Details Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky

2006-08-23

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0608501v1

Physics

Condensed Matter

Superconductivity

6 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

The reason behind the discrepancy between the phase diagrams of our earlier
work [1] and the comment of Sheehy and Radzihovsky [2] is discussed. We show
that, in contrast to what is claimed in [2], the requirement of positive
susceptibility is sufficient to rule out states that are local maximum of the
free energy (as a function of the order parameter $\Delta$

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-109673