Why polymer chains in a melt are not random walks

Physics – Condensed Matter – Soft Condensed Matter

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 4 figures, EPL, accepted January 2007

Scientific paper

A cornerstone of modern polymer physics is the `Flory ideality hypothesis' which states that a chain in a polymer melt adopts `ideal' random-walk-like conformations. Here we revisit theoretically and numerically this pivotal assumption and demonstrate that there are noticeable deviations from ideality. The deviations come from the interplay of chain connectivity and the incompressibility of the melt, leading to an effective repulsion between chain segments of all sizes $s$. The amplitude of this repulsion increases with decreasing $s$ where chain segments become more and more swollen. We illustrate this swelling by an analysis of the form factor $F(q)$, i.e. the scattered intensity at wavevector $q$ resulting from intramolecular interferences of a chain. A `Kratky plot' of $q^2F(q)$ {\em vs.} $q$ does not exhibit the plateau for intermediate wavevectors characteristic of ideal chains. One rather finds a conspicuous depression of the plateau, $\delta(F^{-1}(q)) = |q|^3/32\rho$, which increases with $q$ and only depends on the monomer density $\rho$.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Why polymer chains in a melt are not random walks does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why polymer chains in a melt are not random walks, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why polymer chains in a melt are not random walks will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-669124

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.