Physics
Scientific paper
Mar 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002angeo..20..301s&link_type=abstract
Annales Geophysicae, vol. 20, Issue 3, pp.301-309
Physics
13
Scientific paper
A number of magnetopause models have been developed in the course of last three decades. We have chosen seven of them and tested them using a fresh set of magnetopause crossings observed by Interball-1, Magion-4, and Geotail satellites. The crossings cover the magnetopause from the subsolar region up to near-Earth tail (XGSE ~ - 20 RE ) and all geomagnetic latitudes. Our study reveals that (1) the difference between investigated models is smaller than the error of prediction caused by the factors not included in models, (2) the dayside magnetopause is indented in the cusp region, (3) the deepness of the indentation can reach ~ 4 RE , and (4) the dimensions of the indentation do not depend on the dipole tilt, whereas its location does.
Borodkova N. N.
Dušík Štefan
Nemecek Zdenek
Prech Lubomír
Safrankova Jana
No associations
LandOfFree
The magnetopause shape and location: a comparison of the Interball and Geotail observations with models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The magnetopause shape and location: a comparison of the Interball and Geotail observations with models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The magnetopause shape and location: a comparison of the Interball and Geotail observations with models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1407779