Similarity and Dissimilarity between Influences of Anchoring Walls and of External Fields on Nematic and Smectic A Phases

Details Similarity and Dissimilarity between Influences of Anchoring Walls and of External Fields on Nematic and Smectic A Phases Similarity and Dissimilarity between Influences of Anchoring Walls and of External Fields on Nematic and Smectic A Phases

2004-12-09

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0412219v1

Physics

Condensed Matter

Soft Condensed Matter

7 pages, 4 figures; accepted for publication in Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst

Scientific paper

The McMillan liquid crystalline models under the influence of homeotropic anchoring walls and of external fields are investigated. For thin systems, the existence of the critical thickness, below which the system does not undergo a discrete phase transition, is confirmed. Apparent differences between the influence of the anchoring walls and of external fields are elucidated by investigating the order parameters and a temperature vs external field phase diagram for the bulk systems.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Similarity and Dissimilarity between Influences of Anchoring Walls and of External Fields on Nematic and Smectic A Phases does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Similarity and Dissimilarity between Influences of Anchoring Walls and of External Fields on Nematic and Smectic A Phases, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Similarity and Dissimilarity between Influences of Anchoring Walls and of External Fields on Nematic and Smectic A Phases will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-151834