Response to "Comment on Ferroelectrically induced weak ferromagnetism by design," by R. de Sousa and J. E. Moore, arXiv:0806.2142

Physics – Condensed Matter – Materials Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

A recent Comment [arXiv:0806.2142] has argued that "there is a simple duality between A-site and B-site" R3c ABO$_3$ materials and that our Letter [PRL 100, 167203 (2208)] "breaks this duality by ignoring a non-polar distortion that is directly measured in crystallography." Here we point out that this is not correct. The Comment contains three elementary crystallographic errors. In this response we address each error in some detail.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Response to "Comment on Ferroelectrically induced weak ferromagnetism by design," by R. de Sousa and J. E. Moore, arXiv:0806.2142 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Response to "Comment on Ferroelectrically induced weak ferromagnetism by design," by R. de Sousa and J. E. Moore, arXiv:0806.2142, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Response to "Comment on Ferroelectrically induced weak ferromagnetism by design," by R. de Sousa and J. E. Moore, arXiv:0806.2142 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-115141

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.