Reply to "Comment on Gap opening in graphene by shear strain''

Physics – Condensed Matter – Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

In reply to the Comment by Ramasubramaniam regarding our article [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 81}, 241412(R) (2010)] we clarify that our results are indeed valid provided that out-of-plane atomic relaxations are inhibited, as it may occur in the technologically relevant case of supported graphene sheets. We argue that the Comment, while overall interesting, is addressed to the different case of a free standing graphene monolayer and, therefore, does not invalidate our conclusions. We also remark that the rippled configuration discussed in the Comment is most likely affected by major size effects and that, contrary to what suggested, our conclusions are not in contrast with the recent work by Pereira {\it et al.} [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 80}, 045401 (2009)].

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reply to "Comment on Gap opening in graphene by shear strain'' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to "Comment on Gap opening in graphene by shear strain'', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to "Comment on Gap opening in graphene by shear strain'' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-231413

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.