Physics – Condensed Matter – Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Scientific paper
2010-08-06
Physics
Condensed Matter
Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Scientific paper
In reply to the Comment by Ramasubramaniam regarding our article [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 81}, 241412(R) (2010)] we clarify that our results are indeed valid provided that out-of-plane atomic relaxations are inhibited, as it may occur in the technologically relevant case of supported graphene sheets. We argue that the Comment, while overall interesting, is addressed to the different case of a free standing graphene monolayer and, therefore, does not invalidate our conclusions. We also remark that the rippled configuration discussed in the Comment is most likely affected by major size effects and that, contrary to what suggested, our conclusions are not in contrast with the recent work by Pereira {\it et al.} [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 80}, 045401 (2009)].
Cadelano Emiliano
Cocco Giulio
Colombo Luciano
No associations
LandOfFree
Reply to "Comment on Gap opening in graphene by shear strain'' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Reply to "Comment on Gap opening in graphene by shear strain'', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to "Comment on Gap opening in graphene by shear strain'' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-231413