Reply to ``Comment on Conservative Force Fields in Nonextensive Kinetic Theory"

Physics – Condensed Matter – Statistical Mechanics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

7 pages, first version

Scientific paper

It is shown that the comment by Costa and Meneses [1] did not point any technical or conceptual flaw in our paper titled ``Conservative Force Fields in Nonextensive Kinetic Theory" (Physica A 316, 289 (2002)). In particular, the application of the nonextensive distribution to the historical problem of the unbounded isothermal atmosphere under constant gravity is theoretically correct. It should be stressed that our solution is somewhat connected with a similar solution to a problem appearing in the astrophysical domain, namely, the so-called singular isothermal sphere. Actually, both problems are solved by a stationary Tsallis q-distribution with a "thermal cut-off" in the allowed values of the energy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reply to ``Comment on Conservative Force Fields in Nonextensive Kinetic Theory" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to ``Comment on Conservative Force Fields in Nonextensive Kinetic Theory", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to ``Comment on Conservative Force Fields in Nonextensive Kinetic Theory" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-457928

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.