Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010agufm.p51d1476s&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #P51D-1476
Physics
[5464] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Remote Sensing
Scientific paper
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Wide Angle Camera (WAC) acquires near global coverage on a monthly basis. The WAC is a push frame sensor with a 90° field of view (FOV) in BW mode and 60° FOV in 7-color mode (320 nm to 689 nm). WAC images are acquired during each orbit in 10° latitude segments with cross track coverage of ~50 km. Before mosaicking, WAC images are radiometrically calibrated to remove instrumental artifacts and to convert at sensor radiance to I/F. Images are also photometrically normalized to common viewing and illumination angles (30° phase), a challenge due to the wide angle nature of the WAC where large differences in phase angle are observed in a single image line (±30°). During a single month the equatorial incidence angle drifts about 28° and over the course of ~1 year the lighting completes a 360° cycle. The light scattering properties of the lunar surface depend on incidence(i), emission(e), and phase(p) angles as well as soil properties such as single-scattering albedo and roughness that vary with terrain type and state of maturity [1]. We first tested a Lommel-Seeliger Correction (LSC) [cos(i)/(cos(i) + cos(e))] [2] with a phase function defined by an exponential decay plus 4th order polynomial term [3] which did not provide an adequate solution. Next we employed a LSC with an exponential 2nd order decay phase correction that was an improvement, but still exhibited unacceptable frame-to-frame residuals. In both cases we fitted the LSC I/F vs. phase angle to derive the phase corrections. To date, the best results are with a lunar-lambert function [4] with exponential 2nd order decay phase correction (LLEXP2) [(A1exp(B1p)+A2exp(B2p)+A3) * cos(i)/(cos(e) + cos(i)) + B3cos(i)]. We derived the parameters for the LLEXP2 from repeat imaging of a small region and then corrected that region with excellent results. When this correction was applied to the whole Moon the results were less than optimal - no surprise given the variability of the regolith from region to region. As the fitting area increases, the accuracy of curve fitting decreases due to the larger variety of albedo, topography, and composition. Thus we have adopted an albedo-dependent photometric normalization routine. Phase curves are derived for discreet bins of preliminary normalized reflectance calculated from Clementine global mosaic in a fitting area that is composed of predominantly mare in Oceanus Procellarum. The global WAC mosaic was then corrected pixel-by-pixel according to its preliminary reflectance map with satisfactory results. We observed that the phase curves per normalized-reflectance bins become steeper as the reflectance value increases. Further filtering by using FeO, TiO2, or optical maturity [5] for parameter calculations may help elucidate the effects of surface composition and maturity on photometric properties of the surface. [1] Hapke, B.W. (1993) Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy, Cambridge Univ. Press. [2] Schoenberg (1925) Ada. Soc. Febb., vol. 50. [3] Hillier et al. (1999) Icarus 141, 205-225. [4] McEwen (1991) Icarus 92, 298-311. [5] Lucey et al. (2000) JGR, v105, no E8, p20377-20386.
Denevi B. B.
Hapke Bruce W.
LROC Science Team
McEwen Alfred S.
Robinson Mark S.
No associations
LandOfFree
Photometric normalization of LROC WAC images does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Photometric normalization of LROC WAC images, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Photometric normalization of LROC WAC images will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1498458