Parallel versus sequential updating for Belief Propagation decoding

Physics – Condensed Matter – Statistical Mechanics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

15 pages, 3 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. E june 2002

Scientific paper

sequential updating scheme (SUS) for the belief propagation algorithm is proposed, and is compared with the parallel (regular) updating scheme (PUS). Simulation results on various codes indicate that the number of iterations of the belief algorithm for the SUS is about one half of the required iterations for the PUS, where both decoding algorithms have the same error correction properties. The complexity per iteration for both schemes is similar, resulting in a lower total complexity for the SUS. The explanation of this effect is related to the inter-iteration information sharing, which is a property of only the SUS, and which increases the "correction gain" per iteration

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Parallel versus sequential updating for Belief Propagation decoding does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Parallel versus sequential updating for Belief Propagation decoding, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Parallel versus sequential updating for Belief Propagation decoding will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-573846

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.