Physics – Condensed Matter – Materials Science
Scientific paper
2009-09-25
Physics
Condensed Matter
Materials Science
Physical Review B, in press
Scientific paper
A long-standing question is why Poisson's ratio v nearly always exceeds 0.2 for isotropic materials, whereas classical elasticity predicts v to be between -1 to 1/2. We show that the roots of quadratic relations from classical elasticity divide v into three possible ranges: -1 < v <= 0, 0 <= v <= 1/5, and 1/5 <= v < 1/2. Since elastic properties are unique there can be only one valid set of roots, which must be 1/5 <= v < 1/2 for consistency with the behavior of real materials. Materials with Poisson's ratio outside of this range are rare, and tend to be either very hard (e.g., diamond, beryllium) or porous (e.g., auxetic foams); such substances have more complex behavior than can be described by classical elasticity. Thus, classical elasticity is inapplicable whenever v < 1/5, and the use of the equations from classical elasticity for such materials is inappropriate.
Mott PH
Roland CM
No associations
LandOfFree
Limits to Poisson's ratio in isotropic materials does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Limits to Poisson's ratio in isotropic materials, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Limits to Poisson's ratio in isotropic materials will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-326102