Physics – Condensed Matter
Scientific paper
1994-07-08
J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6(1994)3785-3792
Physics
Condensed Matter
13 pages, LaTex, 7 figures on request
Scientific paper
10.1088/0953-8984/6/20/018
We reconsider the results cocerning the extreme-quantum $S=1/2$ square-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet with frustrating diagonal couplings ($J_1-J_2$ model) drawn from a comparison with exact-diagonalization data. A combined approach using also some intrinsic features of the self-consistent spin-wave theory leads to the conclusion that the theory strongly overestimates the stabilizing role of quantum flutcuations in respect to the N\'{e}el phase in the extreme-quantum case $S=1/2$. On the other hand, the analysis implies that the N\'{e}el phase remains stable at least up to the limit $J_{2}/J_{1} = 0.49$ which is pretty larger than some previous estimates. In addition, it is argued that the spin-wave ansatz predicts the existence of a finite range ($J_{2}/J_{1}<0.323$ in the linear spin-wave theory) where the Marshall-Peierls sigh rule survives the frustrations.
Ivanov N. B.
Richter Jadwiga
No associations
LandOfFree
$J_1-J_2$ Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnet: Improved Spin-Wave Theories Versus Exact-Diagonalization Data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with $J_1-J_2$ Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnet: Improved Spin-Wave Theories Versus Exact-Diagonalization Data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and $J_1-J_2$ Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnet: Improved Spin-Wave Theories Versus Exact-Diagonalization Data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-713551