Hong et al. reply to Walliser

Details Hong et al. reply to Walliser Hong et al. reply to Walliser

2002-02-21

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0202384v1

Physics

Condensed Matter

Statistical Mechanics

Scientific paper

We find it absurd that Walliser [1] essentially used the same analysis and obtained identical results as reported in [3], yet arrived at different conclusions. Namely, based on an incomplete theory and using erroneous arguments, he not only disputes the original results [2], but also claims them wrong. A more complete theory and much more detailed studies were published in [3], from which we concluded that such results support the mechanism of segregation introduced in ref. [2]. We want to make it clear that Walliser obtained partial results of ref. [3] and arrived at the opposite conclusion. In the following we discuss his comment and its relevance, but at the same time point out what went wrong with his arguments.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Hong et al. reply to Walliser does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Hong et al. reply to Walliser, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hong et al. reply to Walliser will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-339214