Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Dec 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011agufmsa32a..05r&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2011, abstract #SA32A-05
Physics
Geophysics
[2407] Ionosphere / Auroral Ionosphere, [2431] Ionosphere / Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Interactions, [3225] Mathematical Geophysics / Numerical Approximations And Analysis, [7959] Space Weather / Models
Scientific paper
As part to the GEM-CEDAR challenge we are extending the model-data comparisons to electrodynamic in-situ measurements in low-Earth orbit. We use DMSP observations of electric and magnetic fields to compute Poynting Flux values along the satellite track in high latitudes including the auroral zones and the polar cap. Models of the ionosphere that include electrodynamic parameters have been run for five events selected for the GEM-CEDAR modeling challenge for which DMSP data are available for comparison. Combined with a magnetic field model we use the modeled electric fields to compute Poynting Flux and Joule Dissipation values from outputs of CTIPe, TIE-GCM, the ionospheric electrodynamics solvers of the SWMF, LFM and OpenGGCM magnetosphere-ionosphere coupled models, and the Weimer electric field model. The online metrics analysis tool at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) has been updated to handle the analysis of separate short segments of available data (high-latitude sections of the satellite orbit) with model outputs to analyze how well auroral patterns are being reproduced by the models. We present initial results from the new analysis tool in terms of model yields (ratio of the difference between maximum and minimum values of model results to the observation), timing/location errors of local maxima in the inbound and outbound auroral crossings as well as cross-correlations for individual passes. We collect the information for many DMSP passes and present an analysis for model performance during quiet and geomagnetically disturbed time periods using half-orbit integrated values as well.
Fuller-Rowell Tim J.
Hesse Matthias
Kilcommons L.
Knipp Delores J.
Kuznetsova Masha
No associations
LandOfFree
GEM-CEDAR Challenge: Comparing Ionospheric Models with Poynting Flux from DMSP Observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with GEM-CEDAR Challenge: Comparing Ionospheric Models with Poynting Flux from DMSP Observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and GEM-CEDAR Challenge: Comparing Ionospheric Models with Poynting Flux from DMSP Observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-874367