Physics
Scientific paper
Jul 2000
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2000spie.4000.1140s&link_type=abstract
Proc. SPIE Vol. 4000, p. 1140-1155, Optical Microlithography XIII, Christopher J. Progler; Ed.
Physics
Scientific paper
Experiments and simulations were done to determine which pitches are forbidden for 130nm and 110nm features. Off axis illumination, annular and Quasar, and different reticle types, binary mask (BIM), 6 percent attenuating phase shift mask (PSM), 18 percent attenuating PSM, and alternating PSM were simulated and were exposed on an ASML PAS5500/700. Except for the 1:1 line to space ratio, Quasar for the BIM and the attenuated PSM had the largest process window without forbidden pitches. By increasing the transmission the exposure latitude increases. Increasing transmission, however, does not improve the depth of focus (DOF). Annular illumination was ineffective in increasing the DOF beyond 0.5micrometers for both the 130nm and 110nm features. The alternating PSM with low sigma had no forbidden pitches and had the largest DOF. Alternating PSM with high sigma however, was unable to resolve the dense pitches with sufficient process window.
Capodieci Luigi
Chen Jang Fung
Cummings Kevin D.
Dusa Mircea V.
Finders Jo
No associations
LandOfFree
Forbidden pitches for 130-nm lithography and below does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Forbidden pitches for 130-nm lithography and below, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Forbidden pitches for 130-nm lithography and below will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1480301