Physics – Condensed Matter – Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Scientific paper
2007-04-09
Physics
Condensed Matter
Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
J. Computational Electronics (accepted, 20 February 2007)
Scientific paper
The validity of the DFT models implemented by FIREBALL for CNT electronic device modeling is assessed. The effective masses, band gaps, and transmission coefficients of semi-conducting, zigzag, (n,0) carbon nanotubes (CNTs) resulting from the ab initio tight-binding density functional theory (DFT) code FIREBALL and the empirical, nearest-neighbor pi-bond model are compared for all semiconducting n values 5 <(=) n <(=) 35. The DFT values for the effective masses differ from the pi-bond values by +(-) 9% over the range of n values, 17 <(=) n <(=) 29, most important for electronic device applications. Over the range 13 <(=) n <(=) 35, the DFT bandgaps are less than the empirical bandgaps by 20-180 meV depending on the functional and the n value. The pi-bond model gives results that differ signifcantly from the DFT results when the CNT diameter goes below 1 nm due to the large curvature of the CNT. The pi-bond model quickly becomes inaccurate away from the bandedges for a (10, 0) CNT, and it is completely inaccurate for n <(=) 8.
Alam Khairul
Bruque Nicolas A.
Lake Roger K.
Pandey Rajeev R.
Shah Deep
No associations
LandOfFree
Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Calculated from Density Functional Theory and the Empirical pi-Bond Model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Calculated from Density Functional Theory and the Empirical pi-Bond Model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Calculated from Density Functional Theory and the Empirical pi-Bond Model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-207001