Electron-doping versus hole-doping in the 2D t-t' Hubbard model

Details Electron-doping versus hole-doping in the 2D t-t' Hubbard model Electron-doping versus hole-doping in the 2D t-t' Hubbard model

2001-03-07

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0103172v1

Physics

Condensed Matter

Strongly Correlated Electrons

11 pages, 16 figures

Scientific paper

10.1007/PL00011117

We compare the one-loop renormalization group flow to strong coupling of the electronic interactions in the two-dimensional t-t'-Hubbard model with t'=-0.3t for band fillings smaller and larger than half-filling. Using a numerical N-patch scheme (N=32...96) we show that in the electron-doped case with decreasing electron density there is a rapid transition from a d(x^2-y^2)-wave superconducting regime with small characteristic energy scale to an approximate nesting regime with strong antiferromagnetic tendencies and higher energy scales. This contrasts with the hole-doped side discussed recently which exhibits a broad parameter region where the renormalization group flow suggests a truncation of the Fermi surface at the saddle points. We compare the quasiparticle scattering rates obtained from the renormalization group calculation which further emphasize the differences between the two cases.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Electron-doping versus hole-doping in the 2D t-t' Hubbard model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Electron-doping versus hole-doping in the 2D t-t' Hubbard model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electron-doping versus hole-doping in the 2D t-t' Hubbard model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-489999