Physics – Condensed Matter – Superconductivity
Scientific paper
1999-12-20
Sol. State Commun. 114, 1 (2000)
Physics
Condensed Matter
Superconductivity
8 pages 3 figures
Scientific paper
10.1016/S0038-1098(99)00582-7
Magnetization hysteresis loop $M(H)$ measurements performed on a single crystalline Ba$_{0.63}$K$_{0.37}$BiO$_3$ superconducting thick film reveal pronounced sample geometry dependence of the "second magnetization peak" (SMP), i.e. a maximum in the width of $M(H)$ occurring at the field $H_{\rm SMP}(T)$. In particular, it is found that the SMP vanishes decreasing the film dimension. We argue that the observed sample geometry dependence of the SMP cannot be accounted for by models which assume a vortex pinning enhancement as the origin of the SMP. Our results can be understood considering the thermomagnetic instability effect and/or non-uniform current distribution at $H < H_{\rm SMP}$ in large enough samples.
Barilo Sergei N.
Esquinazi Pablo
Galkin Yu. A.
Kopelevich Yakov
Pan V. M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Effect of the sample geometry on the second magnetization peak in single crystalline Ba$_{0.63}$K$_{0.37}$BiO$_3$ thick film does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Effect of the sample geometry on the second magnetization peak in single crystalline Ba$_{0.63}$K$_{0.37}$BiO$_3$ thick film, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Effect of the sample geometry on the second magnetization peak in single crystalline Ba$_{0.63}$K$_{0.37}$BiO$_3$ thick film will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-714037