Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of $La_{1-x} Sr_x MnO_3$

Details Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of $La_{1-x} Sr_x MnO_3$ Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of $La_{1-x} Sr_x MnO_3$

1995-01-09

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9501034v1

Physics

Condensed Matter

Figure available via concentional mail. Contact millis@physics.att.com

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.5144

The $La_{1-x} Sr_x MnO_3$ system with $0.2 \lesssim x \lesssim 0.4$ has traditionally been modelled with a ``double exchange'' Hamiltonian, in which it is assumed that the only relevant physics is the tendency of carrier hopping to line up neighboring spins. We present a solution of the double exchange model, show it is incompatible with many aspects of the resistivity data, and propose that a strong electron-phonon interaction arising from a Jahn-Teller splitting of the outer Mn d-level plays a crucial role.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of $La_{1-x} Sr_x MnO_3$ does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of $La_{1-x} Sr_x MnO_3$, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of $La_{1-x} Sr_x MnO_3$ will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-574824