Could $Y_{b}(10890)$ be the P-wave $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$ tetraquark state?

Details Could $Y_{b}(10890)$ be the P-wave $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$ tetraquark state? Could $Y_{b}(10890)$ be the P-wave $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$ tetraquark state?

2010-11-12

arxiv.org/abs/1011.2815v1

JHEP 1011:057, 2010

Physics

High Energy Physics

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

the version accepted for publication in JHEP

Scientific paper

10.1007/JHEP11(2010)057

Assuming $Y_{b}(10890)$ as a P-wave $bq$-scalar-diquark $\bar{b}\bar{q}$-scalar-antidiquark tetraquark state, the mass of $Y_{b}(10890)$ is computed in the framework of QCD sum rule method. Technically, contributions of operators up to dimension six are included in the operator product expansion (OPE). The numerical result $10.88\pm0.13 GeV$ for $Y_{b}(10890)$ agrees well with the experimental value, which favors the P-wave $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$ tetraquark configuration for $Y_{b}(10890)$. In the same picture, the mass of $Y(4360)$ is calculated and the result $4.32\pm0.20 GeV$ is compatible with the experimental data, which supports $Y(4360)$'s P-wave $[cq][\bar{c}\bar{q}]$ structure.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Could $Y_{b}(10890)$ be the P-wave $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$ tetraquark state? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Could $Y_{b}(10890)$ be the P-wave $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$ tetraquark state?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Could $Y_{b}(10890)$ be the P-wave $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$ tetraquark state? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-203370