Nonlinear Sciences – Chaotic Dynamics
Scientific paper
2004-01-18
Nonlinear Sciences
Chaotic Dynamics
40 pages, 14 figures
Scientific paper
10.1016/j.physd.2004.01.003
Empirical modelling often aims for the simplest model consistent with the data. A new technique is presented which quantifies the consistency of the model dynamics as a function of location in state space. As is well-known, traditional statistics of nonlinear models like root-mean-square (RMS) forecast error can prove misleading. Testing consistency is shown to overcome some of the deficiencies of RMS error, both within the perfect model scenario and when applied to data from several physical systems using previously published models. In particular, testing for consistent nonlinear dynamics provides insight towards (i) identifying when a delay reconstruction fails to be an embedding, (ii) allowing state dependent model selection and (iii) optimising local neighbourhood size. It also provides a more relevant (state dependent) threshold for identifying false nearest neighbours.
McSharry Patrick E.
Smith Leonard A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Consistent nonlinear dynamics: identifying model inadequacy does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Consistent nonlinear dynamics: identifying model inadequacy, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Consistent nonlinear dynamics: identifying model inadequacy will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-28735