Physics – Condensed Matter – Materials Science
Scientific paper
2001-12-08
Physics
Condensed Matter
Materials Science
9 pages, 3 figures
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevB.66.073103
We present a comparison of real-space methods based on regular grids for electronic structure calculations that are designed to have basis set variational properties, using as a reference the conventional method of finite differences (a real-space method that is not variational) and the reciprocal-space plane-wave method which is fully variational. We find that a new definition of the finite differences method [P. Maragakis, J. Soler, and E. Kaxiras, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{64}, 193101 (2001)] satisfies one of the two properties of variational behaviour at the cost of larger errors than the conventional finite differences method. On the other hand, a technique which represents functions in a number of plane-waves which is independent of system size, follows closely the plane-wave method and therefore also the criteria for variational behaviour. Its application is only limited by the requirement of having functions strictly localised in regions of real-space but this is a characteristic of most modern real-space methods as they are designed to have a computational cost that scales linearly with system size.
Diéguez Oswaldo
Haynes Peter D.
Payne Mike C.
Skylaris Chris-Kriton
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of variational real-space representations of the kinetic energy operator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of variational real-space representations of the kinetic energy operator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of variational real-space representations of the kinetic energy operator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-406987