Physics – Optics
Scientific paper
Dec 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995spie.2580..275l&link_type=abstract
Proc. SPIE Vol. 2580, p. 275-287, Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems, Anton Kohnle; Ed.
Physics
Optics
Scientific paper
The object of this communication is to compare two inversion algorithms in their application to the blind deconvolution problem. After a brief summary of the previous works in this field, we describe the Richardson-Lucy and the steepest descent algorithms and we introduce these methods in the basic error reduction algorithm of Ayers and Dainty. These algorithms are compared when used for blind deconvolution of simulated binary objects convolved by a point spread function and corrupted by a Gaussian additive noise. We consider the effects of the noise level on the reconstruction error, together with the effects of the algorithmic parameters (inner and outer iteration numbers). Particular effects occurring during the reconstruction process are also shown.
Aime Claude
Barilli Marco
Beaumont Hubert
Gaucherel Philippe
Lanteri Henri
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of several algorithms for blind deconvolution: analysis of noise effects does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of several algorithms for blind deconvolution: analysis of noise effects, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of several algorithms for blind deconvolution: analysis of noise effects will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1564974