Comparison of s- and d-wave gap symmetry in nonequilibrium superconductivity

Physics – Condensed Matter – Superconductivity

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

14 pages, 11 figures

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevB.67.214506

Recent application of ultrafast pump/probe optical techniques to superconductors has renewed interest in nonequilibrium superconductivity and the predictions that would be available for novel superconductors, such as the high-Tc cuprates. We have reexamined two of the classical models which have been used in the past to interpret nonequilibrium experiments with some success: the mu* model of Owen and Scalapino and the T* model of Parker. Predictions depend on pairing symmetry. For instance, the gap suppression due to excess quasiparticle density n in the mu* model, varies as n^{3/2} in d-wave as opposed to n for s-wave. Finally, we consider these models in the context of S-I-N tunneling and optical excitation experiments. While we confirm that recent pump/probe experiments in YBCO, as presently interpreted, are in conflict with d-wave pairing, we refute the further claim that they agree with s-wave.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparison of s- and d-wave gap symmetry in nonequilibrium superconductivity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of s- and d-wave gap symmetry in nonequilibrium superconductivity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of s- and d-wave gap symmetry in nonequilibrium superconductivity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-618588

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.