Physics – Classical Physics
Scientific paper
2010-05-20
Am. J. Phys. 78(12), December 2010
Physics
Classical Physics
3 pages, no figures. Corrected to state that inclusion of the hidden momentum halves the non-Coulomb force rather than doublin
Scientific paper
In their recent paper, Kholmetskii, Missevitch, and Yarman "reanalyze the usual classical derivation of spin-orbit coupling in hydrogenlike atoms" and find a result "in qualitative agreement with the solution of the Dirac-Coulomb equation for hydrogenlike atoms." However, the authors' result is based on an equation of translational motion of the electron that omits any contribution due to the existence of "hidden" momentum of the electron intrinsic magnetic dipole moment in the electric field of the nucleus. Accounting for hidden momentum is necessary to obtaining conservation of linear momentum in the interaction of a magnetic dipole with a point charge. If hidden momentum is omitted from the description, the force on the nucleus due to the electron will differ from the force on the electron due to the nucleus. Thus, omitting the hidden momentum contribution, the binding energy including the spin-orbit coupling cannot be consistently calculated, while including hidden momentum, the value obtained is in disagreement with experiment.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comment on "On the classical analysis of spin-orbit coupling in hydrogenlike atoms," [Am. J. Phys. 78 (4) 428-432, April 2010] does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comment on "On the classical analysis of spin-orbit coupling in hydrogenlike atoms," [Am. J. Phys. 78 (4) 428-432, April 2010], we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "On the classical analysis of spin-orbit coupling in hydrogenlike atoms," [Am. J. Phys. 78 (4) 428-432, April 2010] will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-338523