Comment on "Is Tsallis Thermodynamics Nonextensive?" by E. Vives and A. Planes [cond-mat/0106428]

Physics – Condensed Matter – Statistical Mechanics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

2 pages, no figures. Submitted to PRL

Scientific paper

We comment on letter ``Is Tsallis Thermodynamics Nonextensive?'' by E. Vives and A. Planes [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 020601 (2002) cond-mat/0106428]. It is pointed out that the Euler and Gibbs-Duhem equations derived in the letter can serve to justify an appropriate form for the Lagrange parameters controlling thermal equilibrium, without need of any change of variables. This leads to a framework for Tsallis Thermodynamics which is free from recent criticisms raised by Nauenberg [Phys. Rev. E 67, 036114 (2003) cond-mat/0210561] and Gross [Physica (Amsterdam) 305, 99 (2002) cond-mat/0106496]. This is accomplished through a direct connection with Hill's Nanothermodynamics.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on "Is Tsallis Thermodynamics Nonextensive?" by E. Vives and A. Planes [cond-mat/0106428] does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on "Is Tsallis Thermodynamics Nonextensive?" by E. Vives and A. Planes [cond-mat/0106428], we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Is Tsallis Thermodynamics Nonextensive?" by E. Vives and A. Planes [cond-mat/0106428] will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-136800

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.