Bandwidth-control vs. doping-control Mott transition in the Hubbard model

Details Bandwidth-control vs. doping-control Mott transition in the Hubbard model Bandwidth-control vs. doping-control Mott transition in the Hubbard model

2005-10-21

arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0510564v3

Phys. Rev. B 74, 115122 (2006)

Physics

Condensed Matter

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevB.74.115122

We reinvestigate the bandwidth-control and doping-control Mott transitions (BCMT and DCMT) from a spin liquid Mott insulator to a Fermi liquid metal based on the slave-rotor representation of the Hubbard model,\cite{Florens} where the Mott transitions are described by softening of bosonic collective excitations. We find that the nature of the insulating phase away from half filling is different from that of half filling in the respect that a charge density wave coexists with a topological order (spin liquid) away from half filling because the condensation of vortices generically breaks translational symmetry in the presence of "dual magnetic fields" resulting from hole doping while the topological order remains stable owing to gapless excitations near the Fermi surface. Performing a renormalization group analysis, we discuss the role of dissipative gauge fluctuations due to the Fermi surface in both the BCMT and the DCMT.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Bandwidth-control vs. doping-control Mott transition in the Hubbard model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Bandwidth-control vs. doping-control Mott transition in the Hubbard model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bandwidth-control vs. doping-control Mott transition in the Hubbard model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-89664