B12Hn and B12Fn: Planar vs Icosahedral Structures

Physics – Condensed Matter – Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

10 pages

Scientific paper

Using density functional theory (DFT) and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations we show that the B12Hn and B12Fn (n = 0-4) quasi-planar structures are energetically more favorable than the corresponding icosahedral clusters. Moreover, we show that the fully planar B12F6 cluster is more stable than the 3D counterpart. These results open up the possibility of designing larger boron based nanostructures starting from quasi-planar or fully planar building blocks.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

B12Hn and B12Fn: Planar vs Icosahedral Structures does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with B12Hn and B12Fn: Planar vs Icosahedral Structures, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and B12Hn and B12Fn: Planar vs Icosahedral Structures will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-33396

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.