Angular resolved specific heat in iron-based superconductors: the case for nodeless extended $s$-wave gap

Physics – Condensed Matter – Superconductivity

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages, 4 figures

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevB.82.060504

We consider the variation of the field-induced component of the specific heat $C({\bf H})$ with the direction of the applied field in $Fe-$pnictides within quasi-classical Doppler-shift approximation, with special emphasis to recent experiments on FeSe$_{0.4}$Te$_{0.6}$ [Zheng et al., arXiv:1004.2236]. We show that for extended $s-$wave gap with no nodes, $C({\bf H})$ has $\cos 4 \phi$ component, where $\phi$ is the angle between ${\bf H}$ and the direction between hole and electron Fermi surfaces. The maxima of $C({\bf H})$ are at $\pi/4$, $3\pi/4$, etc. if the applied field is smaller than $H_0 \leq 1T$, and at $\phi =0, \pi/2$, etc. if the applied field is larger than $H_0$. The angle-dependence of $C({\bf H})$, the positions of the maxima, and the relative magnitude of the oscillating component are consistent with the experiments performed in the field of $9T >> H_0$. We show that the observed $\cos 4 \phi$ variation does not hold if the $s-$wave gap has accidental nodes along the two electron Fermi surfaces.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Angular resolved specific heat in iron-based superconductors: the case for nodeless extended $s$-wave gap does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Angular resolved specific heat in iron-based superconductors: the case for nodeless extended $s$-wave gap, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Angular resolved specific heat in iron-based superconductors: the case for nodeless extended $s$-wave gap will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-99717

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.