Physics – Classical Physics
Scientific paper
2005-12-07
Forthcoming 2006, in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Physics
Classical Physics
41 pages Latex
Scientific paper
This paper forms part of a wider campaign: to deny pointillisme. That is the doctrine that a physical theory's fundamental quantities are defined at points of space or of spacetime, and represent intrinsic properties of such points or point-sized objects located there; so that properties of spatial or spatiotemporal regions and their material contents are determined by the point-by-point facts. More specifically, this paper argues against pointillisme about the concept of velocity in classical mechanics; especially against proposals by Tooley, Robinson and Lewis. A companion paper argues against pointillisme about (chrono)-geometry, as proposed by Bricker. To avoid technicalities, I conduct the argument almost entirely in the context of ``Newtonian'' ideas about space and time, and the classical mechanics of point-particles, i.e. extensionless particles moving in a void. But both the debate and my arguments carry over to relativistic physics.
No associations
LandOfFree
Against Pointillisme about Mechanics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Against Pointillisme about Mechanics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Against Pointillisme about Mechanics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-443379