Statistics – Computation
Scientific paper
Dec 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006isis...97..605h&link_type=abstract
Isis. Journal of the History of Science Society (ISSN 0021-1753), Vol. 97, No. 4, p. 605 - 633 (2006)
Statistics
Computation
History, Graphical Methods
Scientific paper
In 1833 John Herschel published a graphical method for determining the orbits of double stars. He argued that this method, which depended on human judgment rather than mathematical analysis, gave better results than computation, given the uncertainty in the data. Herschel found that astronomy and terrestrial physics were especially suitable for graphical treatment, and he expected that graphs would soon become important in all areas of science. He argued with William Whewell and James D. Forbes over the process of induction, over the application of probability, and over the moral content of science. Graphs entered into all these debates, but because they constituted a method, not a metaphysics, they were acceptable to most practicing scientists and became increasingly popular throughout the nineteenth century.
No associations
LandOfFree
A "Large and Graceful Sinuosity": John Herschel's Graphical Method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A "Large and Graceful Sinuosity": John Herschel's Graphical Method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A "Large and Graceful Sinuosity": John Herschel's Graphical Method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1546058