Physics – Condensed Matter – Strongly Correlated Electrons
Scientific paper
2002-02-27
Physics
Condensed Matter
Strongly Correlated Electrons
3 pages
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevB.66.216402
Fak, van Dijk and Wills (FDW) question our interpretation of elastic neutron-scattering experiments in the antiferromagnetic phase of UPt_3. They state that our analysis is incorrect because we average over magnetic structures that are disallowed by symmetry. We disagree with FDW and reply to their criticism. FDW also point out that we have mistaken the magnetic field direction in the experiment reported by N. H. van Dijk et al. [Phys. Rev. B 58, 3186 (1998)]. We correct this error and note that our previous conclusion is also valid for the correct field orientation.
Moreno Juana
Sauls J. A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of $UPt_3$''' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of $UPt_3$''', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of $UPt_3$''' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-51953