Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of $UPt_3$'''

Physics – Condensed Matter – Strongly Correlated Electrons

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

3 pages

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevB.66.216402

Fak, van Dijk and Wills (FDW) question our interpretation of elastic neutron-scattering experiments in the antiferromagnetic phase of UPt_3. They state that our analysis is incorrect because we average over magnetic structures that are disallowed by symmetry. We disagree with FDW and reply to their criticism. FDW also point out that we have mistaken the magnetic field direction in the experiment reported by N. H. van Dijk et al. [Phys. Rev. B 58, 3186 (1998)]. We correct this error and note that our previous conclusion is also valid for the correct field orientation.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of $UPt_3$''' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of $UPt_3$''', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to ``Comment on `Magnetic field effects on neutron diffraction in the antiferromagnetic phase of $UPt_3$''' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-51953

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.