Physics – Classical Physics
Scientific paper
2011-07-05
American Journal of Physics, Volume 79, Issue 12, pp. 1246-1249 (2011)
Physics
Classical Physics
11 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication by American Journal of Physics
Scientific paper
10.1119/1.3639130
It is argued that, for motion in a central force field, polar reciprocals of trajectories are an elegant alternative to hodographs. The principal advantage of polar reciprocals is that the transformation from a trajectory to its polar reciprocal is its own inverse. The form of polar reciprocals $k_*$ of Kepler problem orbits is established, and then the orbits $k$ themselves are shown to be conic sections using the fact that $k$ is the polar reciprocal of $k_*$. A geometrical construction is presented for the orbits of the Kepler problem starting from their polar reciprocals. No obscure knowledge of conics is required to demonstrate the validity of the method. Unlike a graphical procedure suggested by Feynman (and amended by Derbes), the algorithm based on polar reciprocals works without alteration for all three kinds of trajectories in the Kepler problem (elliptical, parabolic, and hyperbolic).
No associations
LandOfFree
Orbits of the Kepler problem via polar reciprocals does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Orbits of the Kepler problem via polar reciprocals, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Orbits of the Kepler problem via polar reciprocals will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-476428