Tetragonal tungsten bronze compounds: relaxor vs mixed ferroelectric - dipole glass behavior

Physics – Condensed Matter – Materials Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 two-column pages, 4 figures

Scientific paper

We demonstrate that recent experimental data (E. Castel et al J.Phys. Cond. Mat. {\bf 21} (2009), 452201) on tungsten bronze compound (TBC) Ba$_2$Pr$_x$Nd$_{1-x}$FeNb$_4$O$_{15}$ can be well explained in our model predicting a crossover from ferroelectric ($x=0$) to orientational (dipole) glass ($x=1$), rather then relaxor, behavior. We show, that since a "classical" perovskite relaxor like Pb(Mn$_{1/3}$ Nb$_{2/3}$)O$_3$ is never a ferroelectric, the presence of ferroelectric hysteresis loops in TBC shows that this substance actually transits from ferroelectric to orientational glass phase with $x$ growth. To describe the above crossover theoretically, we use the simple replica-symmetric solution for disordered Ising model.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Tetragonal tungsten bronze compounds: relaxor vs mixed ferroelectric - dipole glass behavior does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Tetragonal tungsten bronze compounds: relaxor vs mixed ferroelectric - dipole glass behavior, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Tetragonal tungsten bronze compounds: relaxor vs mixed ferroelectric - dipole glass behavior will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-342485

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.