Physics – Condensed Matter – Statistical Mechanics
Scientific paper
2006-10-23
Physics
Condensed Matter
Statistical Mechanics
10 pages, 1 figure
Scientific paper
The Comment of A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari (cond-mat/0610113) on our article (cond-mat/0609285) is based on misunderstandings of this article as well as on unfounded implicit assumptions. We clarify here the controversial points and show that, contrary to what is asserted by these authors, our paper is free of any contradiction and agrees with all well-established theoretical and experimental results. Also, we maintain that our work reveals pathologies in the (treatment of) perturbative approaches performed at fixed dimensions. In particular, we emphasize that the perturbative approaches to frustrated magnets performed either within the minimal substraction scheme without epsilon-expansion or in the massive scheme at zero momentum exhibit spurious fixed points and, thus, do not describe correctly the behaviour of these systems in three dimensions.
Delamotte Bertrand
Holovatch Yu.
Ivaneyko Dmytro
Mouhanna Dominique
Tissier Matthieu
No associations
LandOfFree
Reply to: ``Comment on `Spurious fixed points in frustrated magnets,' cond-mat/0609285" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Reply to: ``Comment on `Spurious fixed points in frustrated magnets,' cond-mat/0609285", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to: ``Comment on `Spurious fixed points in frustrated magnets,' cond-mat/0609285" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-276804