Physics
Scientific paper
Jul 1999
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999icar..140..231s&link_type=abstract
Icarus, Volume 140, Issue Icarus, pp. 231-234.
Physics
4
Scientific paper
Although the prevalent mathematical description of the Poynting-Robertson effect is correct, its physical interpretation is sometimes problematic. By means of a two-parameter model, we revisit the effect in order to get a better physical understanding of it. The principal conclusion is that the motion of a dust in circumsolar orbit is governed only by solar radiation absorption and not by the asymmetry of reemission, even when viewed in the rest-frame of the Sun.
No associations
LandOfFree
Physical Interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson Effect does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Physical Interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson Effect, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Physical Interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson Effect will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-995083