Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002jgra..107.1439s&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), Volume 107, Issue A12, pp. SMP 14-1, CiteID 1439, DOI 10.1029/2002JA009389
Physics
5
Magnetospheric Physics: Storms And Substorms, Magnetospheric Physics: Current Systems (2409), Ionosphere: Current Systems (2708), Magnetospheric Physics: Auroral Phenomena (2407)
Scientific paper
A superposed epoch analysis of 100-300 substorms is performed to determine the median size and shape of the substorm-associated VLF chorus, magnetic bay, and Pi2 pulsation burst observed at the near-auroral Halley research station, Antarctica, and at the midlatitude Faraday station at three different local times (2230, 2330, 0130 MLT). The spatial and temporal properties of the magnetic bay signatures are compared with the University of York implementation of the Kisabeth-Rostoker substorm current wedge (SCW) model and the Weimer pulse model, respectively. These constitute the best analytical models of the substorm to date. It is shown that the polarities and relative amplitudes of the observed magnetic bays in the H, D, and Z components at Halley at midnight MLT and at Faraday in the premidnight sector are consistent with the York model for a SCW 3 hours wide in MLT with its westward electrojet at 67°S magnetic latitude. In particular the little-discussed Z component of the bay agrees with the model and is shown to be the clearest substorm signature of the three components, especially at midlatitude. The midnight and postmidnight bays are similar to the premidnight case but progressively smaller and cannot be fully reconciled with the model. The shape of the H and Z bays at Halley and the D bays at Faraday fit a normalized Weimer pulse well, with Weimer's 2 h-1 recovery rate, but the other components do not. The D component at Halley and H at Faraday do fit the Weimer pulse shape but with a faster recovery rate of 4 h-1. It is proposed that this is due to the effect of a decaying current in the SCW combining with the geometrical effect of changing SCW configuration and position relative to the observing station. The Z component at Faraday recovers more slowly than the 2 h-1 Weimer prediction; we cannot explain this. Secondary bays at Halley and Faraday show a clear tendency to recur after 2 hours. Inflection points just prior to onset at Halley and Faraday are argued to be related to reduced convection associated with northward turning of the IMF. The median substorm signature at Halley in the Pi2 frequency band (7-25 mHz) is well correlated with the bay structure, showing that it is part of a broader band, possibly turbulent, spectrum in the substorm-dependent DP2 current. There is evidence of a minor additional narrow band component occurring at substorm onset. This is the dominant signal at Faraday which shows the classic midlatitude substorm signature, a short Pi2 pulsation burst at onset, that decreases progressively in intensity with increasing local time, implying a source region biased to the evening side or else preferred propagation to the east from a near-midnight source.
Freeman Mervyn. P.
Hunter Stanley
Milling David K.
Smith Anthony J.
No associations
LandOfFree
VLF, magnetic bay, and Pi2 substorm signatures at auroral and midlatitude ground stations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with VLF, magnetic bay, and Pi2 substorm signatures at auroral and midlatitude ground stations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and VLF, magnetic bay, and Pi2 substorm signatures at auroral and midlatitude ground stations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-967439