Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach

Details Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach

2005-03-26

arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0503065v1

Physics

Nuclear Physics

Nuclear Theory

2 pages, contribution to the International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics (2005), Bormio (Italy), emphasizes the unjustifie

Scientific paper

Nuclei are small and inhomogeneous. Multi-fragmented nuclei are even more inhomogeneous and the fragments even smaller. System studied in chemical thermodynamics (CTh) consist of several homogeneous macroscopic phases. Evidently, macroscopic statistics as in Chemistry cannot and should not be applied. Taking this serious, fascinating perspectives open for statistical nuclear fragmentation.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-93391