Physics
Scientific paper
Aug 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002jgra..107.1183h&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), Volume 107, Issue A8, pp. SMP 15-1, CiteID 1183, DOI 10.1029/2001JA009229
Physics
8
Atmospheric Composition And Structure: Thermosphere-Energy Deposition, Atmospheric Composition And Structure: Airglow And Aurora, Magnetospheric Physics: Energetic Particles, Precipitating, Magnetospheric Physics: Storms And Substorms
Scientific paper
The IMAGE satellite carries three FUV imagers observing N2 LBH, O I 1356 Å, and HI Lyman α emissions in the polar aurora. These simultaneous observations are used to characterize the precipitating electron and proton energy fluxes. The proton energy flux is derived from the Lyman α measurements on the basis of efficiency curves calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation of the proton aurora. The resulting proton contribution to the N2 LBH and O I 1356 Å emissions is calculated and subtracted to obtain the electron contribution in the other two channels. These two quantities are used to determine the precipitating electron average energy and energy flux. The proton and electron energy fluxes are integrated over the hemisphere to obtain the rate of auroral energy dissipation (hemispheric power) carried by the protons and electrons separately. The time development of the proton and electron aurora during four winter time events is examined. Although the onsets of the proton and electron aurora coincide in time and space, the time of the peak of energy dissipation and the recovery time are often found to differ. The fractional energy flux carried by the protons is highest during quiet periods and reaches a minimum during the most active phase of the substorms. This result is in agreement with the dependence of the fractional proton hemispheric power on magnetic activity measured by NOAA 15. The hemispheric power deduced from the FUV images is compared to the NOAA-deduced values and found to be in reasonable agreement. Sources of uncertainties in the determination of the hemispheric power are discussed on the basis of several sensitivity tests. In particular, it is found that the most critical factor is the assumption made on the energy of the auroral protons if this energy is <25 keV.
Evans Silvan D.
Frey Harald U.
Gérard Jean-Claude
Hubert Bernard
Immel Thomas J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Total electron and proton energy input during auroral substorms: Remote sensing with IMAGE-FUV does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Total electron and proton energy input during auroral substorms: Remote sensing with IMAGE-FUV, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Total electron and proton energy input during auroral substorms: Remote sensing with IMAGE-FUV will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-927799